Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 874 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 1% better in Stray than EPYC 7551P - 181 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Athlon |
| Naples | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
