Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1074 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 4% better in Minecraft than EPYC 7551P - 654 vs 630 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Naples | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 180 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
