Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 648 days older than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 496 vs 492 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 15 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Naples | Codename | Picasso |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
