Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Ryzen 5 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1581 days older than Ryzen 5 3500U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 5 3500U - 500 vs 492 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3500U - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 15 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 5 3500U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Haswell-E | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 85 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
