Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 874 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 0% better in Dishonored 2 than EPYC 7551P - 261 vs 260 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 64 vs 4 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Athlon | Collection | EPYC |
| Picasso | Codename | Naples |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
