Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 1948 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-4160T - 224 vs 223 FPS
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i3 |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 35 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
