Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1074 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than EPYC 7551P - 265 vs 264 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 64 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | EPYC |
| Haswell | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
