Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 49 days older than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 12 vs 4 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
