Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2650 v3 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2650 v3 is 49 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-4160T - 169 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 20 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Xeon E5-2650 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
