Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160T outperforms Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160T is 1722 days older than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U - 229 vs 228 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160T - 15 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 35 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
