Key Differences
In short — Pentium G630 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G630 is 456 days older than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Pentium G630 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Pentium G630
- Performs up to 1% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1610T - 150 vs 148 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$37.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $37.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 162 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Pentium G630 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Pentium |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |