Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 363 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 12% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1610T - 96 vs 86 FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
96
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |