Buy on Amazon
$49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-2100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-2100 is 652 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G1610 - 155 vs 153 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 24% cheaper than Core i3-2100 - $37.0 vs $49.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i3-2100 - $0.24 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-2100 - 55 vs 65 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Intel Core i3-2100 Dual-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 3 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I32100
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Core i3-2100
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
