Buy on Amazon
$48.5
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4370 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4370 is 636 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 5% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-4300 - 157 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-4300 - $0.31 vs $0.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i3-4370 - $48.02 vs $48.5
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
157
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.5
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80646I34370 Core i3-4370 Haswell Dual-Core 3.8GHz LGA 1150 54W Desktop Processor
Buy for $48.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8283 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 3.8 GHz 4 MB Cache Quad-Core CPU Processor FD4300WMW4MHK Socket AM3+
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i3-4370
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4370 | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
