Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 653 days older than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i5-2400S - $48.02 vs $70.0
- Up to 28% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i5-2400S - $0.86 vs $1.19 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 5% better in League of Legends than FX-4300 - 59 vs 56 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $48.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18622 minutes ago
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18622 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400S |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |