Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4150 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-2400S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4150 is 1208 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-2400S.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i5-2400S - 149 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than Core i5-2400S - $45.0 vs $70.0
- Up to 38% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-2400S - $0.3 vs $0.48 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 54 vs 65 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-2400S Quad-Core Processor 2.5 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400S
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
149
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4150 Processor (3M Cache, 3.50 GHz) BX80646I34150
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-2400S
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
