Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2400S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2400S is 694 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400S
- Performs up to 1% better in Remnant II than Celeron G1610 - 79 vs 78 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-2400S - $37.0 vs $70.0
- Up to 47% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i5-2400S - $0.47 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400S - 55 vs 65 Watts
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14145 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400S | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |