Buy on Amazon
$48.1
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4350 outperforms Celeron G1610T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4350 is 514 days newer than Celeron G1610T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610T
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i3-4350 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G1610T - 97 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610T - 4 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4350
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
97
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.5/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-4350 Processor (4M Cache, 3.60 GHz) BX80646I34350
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610T
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i3-4350
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610T | vs | Intel Core i3-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
