Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5650 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5650 is 713 days older than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than FX-6200 - 370 vs 368 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Xeon | Collection | FX |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |