Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5650 outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5650 is 2485 days older than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4551 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |