Key Differences
In short — Xeon X5650 outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon X5650 is 68 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Performs up to 2% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G6950 - 151 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
148
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Xeon | Collection | Pentium |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 73 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |