Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3258 outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3258 is 1539 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3258 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3258
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Xeon X5650 - 159 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Pentium G3258 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Xeon | Collection | Pentium |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |