Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7350K outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7350K is 2485 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon X5650 - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2590 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 60 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |