Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1356 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 0% better in Death Stranding than Xeon X5650 - 214 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon X5650 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5650 doesn't have integrated graphics
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |