Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2985 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dishonored 2 than FX-6200 - 267 vs 254 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $42.85 vs $225.99
- Up to 80% better value when playing Dishonored 2 than Core i7-10700F - $0.17 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
267
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
20%
Price, $
$225.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5032 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5031 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |