Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G6950 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than Pentium G6950 - 279 vs 248 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $47.48 vs $225.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-10700F - $0.19 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
279
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
23%
Price, $
$225.99
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5330 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
248
88%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$47.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $47.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5329 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i7 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |