Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Core i3-4130 - 184 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $41.0 vs $210.0
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
19%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
995
61.72456575682382%
Multi-Core
1960
27.105517909002902%
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |