Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2433 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Saints Row than Core i3-4130 - 165 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $41.13 vs $225.99
- Up to 80% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i7-10700F - $0.27 vs $1.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
165
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.37/FPS
19%
Price, $
$225.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5840 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
155
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5840 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i3-4130 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |