Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3399 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 19% better in Minecraft than Core i5-2400 - 729 vs 611 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $34.95 vs $225.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i7-10700F - $0.06 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
729
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
19%
Price, $
$225.99
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5253 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
611
83%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
No | Overclockable | No |