Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Rocket League than Celeron G3930T - 727 vs 677 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $39.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i7-10700F - $0.06 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
727
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
19%
Price, $
$225.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5770 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5769 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |