Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 1402 days newer than Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G3930T - 253 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $19.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
25.149150986691144%
Multi-Core
948
7.977783388033324%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |