Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1948 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 9% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G540 - 248 vs 228 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 51% cheaper than Celeron G3930T - $19.25 vs $39.0
- Up to 50% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron G3930T - $0.08 vs $0.16 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18863 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
228
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18863 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |