Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $39.0 vs $217.99
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930T - 124 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 20 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75203 minutes ago
Buy for $217.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
32.69689737470167%
Multi-Core
948
11.250890102065036%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |