Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 1766 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $39.0 vs $272.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i9-12900KF - $0.32 vs $1.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 58% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G3930T - 194 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15307 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
22%
Price, $
$272.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $272.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15308 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |