Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 2093 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $39.0 vs $317.99
- Up to 85% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i7-13700KF - $0.12 vs $0.78 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i7-13700KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 28% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G3930T - 408 vs 320 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 24 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15373 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
408
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
15%
Price, $
$317.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $317.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15374 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i7-13700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |