Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8120 - 137 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8120 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $39.99 vs $225.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-10700F - $0.31 vs $1.65 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
18%
Price, $
$225.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5675 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5675 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |