Buy on Amazon
$53
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690K is 546 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 14% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1610 - 171 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-4690K - $37.0 vs $53.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-4690K - $0.25 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 55 vs 88 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i5-4690K Processor 3.9 4 BX80646I54690K
Buy for $53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7540 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7538 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4690K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 88 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
