Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3305 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 52% better in Rust than FX-6200 - 231 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $42.85 vs $179.99
- Up to 64% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-11600K - $0.28 vs $0.78 per FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
35%
Price, $
$179.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 3 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |