Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 78% better in F1 23 than Celeron G3930T - 276 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $19.98 vs $189.0
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
Buy for $19.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
25.068618481244282%
Multi-Core
948
11.05023895558923%
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |