Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600X is 915 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3600X - $39.0 vs $210.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen 5 3600X - $0.29 vs $1.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600X - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
- Performs up to 45% better in War Thunder than Celeron G3930T - 194 vs 134 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 12 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15304 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15305 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |