Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1302 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 79% cheaper than FX-9370 - $39.0 vs $183.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Dead Space than FX-9370 - $0.27 vs $1.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 35 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
Buy for $183 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |