Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 139% better in FIFA 23 than Celeron G1610 - 220 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $37.0 vs $179.99
- Up to 51% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i5-11600K - $0.4 vs $0.82 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 55 vs 125 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
48%
Price, $
$179.99
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 201 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 200 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |