Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i3-7100T - 124 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $51.6 vs $179.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i5-11600K - $0.45 vs $1.45 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.45/FPS
31%
Price, $
$179.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4976 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
114
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4977 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |