Key Differences
In short — Core i5-14400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-14400F is 2561 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-14400F - $51.6 vs $209.99
- Up to 73% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-14400F - $0.35 vs $1.31 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-14400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Dead Space than Core i3-7100T - 160 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
149
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6151 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.31/FPS
26%
Price, $
$209.99
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for $209.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6149 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i5-14400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |