Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 8% better in The Outer Worlds than Celeron G3900 - 212 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $39.9 vs $179.99
- Up to 76% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i5-11600K - $0.2 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 51 vs 125 Watts
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
212
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
23%
Price, $
$179.99
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |