Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 3305 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $42.85 vs $179.99
- Up to 75% better value when playing Stray than Core i5-11600K - $0.24 vs $0.96 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Stray than FX-6200 - 188 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $42.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6969 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
188
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.96/FPS
25%
Price, $
$179.99
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6969 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |