Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 22% better in World of Warcraft than Core i5-7400T - 208 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $78.02 vs $193.98
- Up to 51% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-11600K - $0.46 vs $0.93 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
208
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
49%
Price, $
$193.98
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $193.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
171
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |