Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms EPYC 7742 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 189 days older than EPYC 7742.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 225 vs 255 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 128 vs 56 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 2% better in God of War than EPYC 7742 - 175 vs 171 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7742
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Xeon W-3175X |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 30th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Xeon W |
| Rome | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 3647 |
Server | Segment | Server |
64 | Cores | 28 |
128 | Threads | 56 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 255 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
