Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 1605 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 9% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 176 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 56 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 135 vs 255 Watts
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Server |
28 | Cores | 8 |
56 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 255 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
