Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 1654 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-4160T - 136 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 56 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 35 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i3 |
| Skylake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 2 |
56 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 255 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
