Key Differences
In short — Xeon W-3175X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon W-3175X is 294 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W-3175X
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Athlon 3000G - 184 vs 181 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 56 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3175X - 35 vs 255 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3175X doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon W-3175X
Server/Workstation • Jan 30th, 2019
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W-3175X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 30th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Athlon |
| Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 3647 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
28 | Cores | 2 |
56 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 255 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
